.

Red Light Cameras at Golf, Rand Roads Give Mixed Safety Results

Accidents increase, but deputy police chief says cameras reduce drivers’ speed at intersection

After almost a year of activity, it is not clear whether the red light cameras at the intersection of Golf and Rand roads improved safety.

Accidents at the intersection involving vehicles traveling east and west bound on Golf Road, the same traffic the cameras monitor, rose during the first year after installation. Eight accidents occurred between November 2010 and Sept. 1, 2011, up from two the year before that, said Deputy Police Chief Angela Burton.

Burton added that none of the eight accidents appeared to have been caused by the cameras. Red light cameras have been blamed for causing rear-end accidents when drivers suddenly brake when they see them.

The police department does not have any plans to install more red-light cameras at this time, Burton said.

“I don’t think they’re popular,” Burton said. “And if we can’t tie an improvement to safety to the cameras, then there’s no reason to move forward with other intersections.”

Related:

Burton said police do not look at red-light cameras as a revenue generator.

“We are in the business of safety, not generating revenue,” Burton said.

Burton said while accidents did rise in that time period, she thinks the cameras make many people, including herself, more aware of their driving habits when entering intersections with the camera signage.

In order to understand the cameras’ effect on safety, drivers that receive violations should also be surveyed, Burton said.

“This is something we need to keep looking at,” she added.

Mixed Results

Other municipalities have been more experimental with their red light cameras. Elk Grove Village temporarily disabled a red light camera and found that the number of accidents at that intersection shot up, the Daily Herald reported.

Rosemont, which has red-light cameras at four intersections, saw accidents go down at those intersections, Rosemont Police Lieutenant Keith Kania said.

Kania said data collected by the police department showed accidents at River and Higgins roads went down 62 percent in 2010, and accidents at Mannheim and Higgins roads went down about 25 percent. Rosemont installed its first red-light cameras in 2007.

Before the red-light cameras were installed at River and Devon roads, there were fatal accidents, Kania said. Since the cameras were installed there have not been any fatal accidents at that intersection.

"We have significantly reduced accidents at our most accident-prone intersections," Kania said.

Tickets and Revenue

Red light cameras at the Golf and Rand roads intersection have generated about $280,000 from violations since becoming active in October 2010, said Dorothy Wisniewski, director of finance for Des Plaines.

The Des Plaines Police Department has handed out more than 7700 tickets for red light violations, Burton said.

Each ticket costs violators $100, and the city of Des Plaines keeps $65. RedSpeed Illinois, which installs and maintains red light cameras across the state, gets the other $35.

Burton said a Des Plaines police officer reviews all violations recorded by the cameras at Golf and Rand roads before tickets are sent to violators, something that’s often a misconception among drivers.

All of the tickets issued do not get paid. Some go to court, some go to contest by mail, and once viewed the violator could be found not liable, Burton said. Moreover, the process can take several weeks to cycle, and therefore the number of paid violations is lower than the number of issued violations.

Wisniewski said the city would likely use the money to purchase traffic safety supplies such as speed boards and speed bumps. 

Connect on Facebook.

St Pete Driver October 04, 2011 at 12:44 PM
So if there are more crashes how exactly are they improving safety? Get rid of these things.
Stephen October 04, 2011 at 03:06 PM
You know the claims of "we have had not fatal accidents' at intersections with RLC is HIGHLY Misleading in that they don't mention WHAT THE CAUSES WERE OF THE OTHER FATAL WRECKS! This stunt has been pulled before in LA. http://www.skyvalleychronicle.com/FEATURE-NEWS/HOW-ONE-MAN-DID-THE-HEAVY-LIFTING-THAT-KILLED-L-A-s-RED-LIGHT-TICKET-PROGRAM-br-And-what-lessons-may-be-learned-by-Monroe-and-other-cities-750067 Quote: For example, one LAPD claim was that five fatal accidents occurred at specific intersections before the red-light cameras were installed, and none occurred after. Reality: two of the five accidents were not red light related, he says, and a third involved a drunken driver who zipped through despite a camera there, mounted by a previous vendor. The fourth, "caused by a young distracted driver," likely would not have been prevented by a camera. "They were suggesting the cameras were stopping fatalities," he says, "but the examples they gave would not have been stopped by a red-light camera," said Beeber. Time to Ban the CAMS! www.motorists.org www.banthecams.org www.camerafraud.com www.bhspi.org
John C October 04, 2011 at 04:48 PM
Cameras creat more accidents a half brain knows that. These cameras are installed for one reason, MONEY ie.. Revenue.
Barnet Fagel October 04, 2011 at 08:39 PM
I asked the Des Plaines City council what the leading cause of red light violations was at a council meeting before the cameras were installed. No one in the room including the chief of police knew the answer. Based on the police department's latest statement, they still don't have a clue...
Nate November 07, 2011 at 12:31 PM
If all of the money went to the township, I would be less bothered. It's this $35 from every ticket going to the camera company that sticks in my craw. Let any town that wants a camera pay all fees up front, and pay for maintenance. Let there be a one-time transaction with camera company with no future payments. Then, lower the fee to $75. The township will still retain an extra $10 per violation to cover costs. Currently, RedSpeed Illinois is laughing all the way to the bank at our expense. It brings to mind the Sheriffs of Nottingham from the tales Robin Hood: legal entities, to be sure, but not very moral ones. The lights at the intersection of Golf and Rand roads in Des Plaines reaped $280,000 for the town in one year. That means approximately $100,000 will go to RedSpeed Illinois every year for just that one intersection. Wake up, my friends; a crook by any other name leaves just as bad a taste in the mouth.
kurt swanson November 07, 2011 at 10:09 PM
the un certainty of WHEN the light will change is the problem. i would like to see a timer counting down as to when the light will change.
SSG Marc J. Sierra January 30, 2013 at 05:34 PM
I have a question. If it the main intention is safety and not revenue (which we already know that the outcome was opposite), why then is there no limit or negative consequences if you continue to run the red light and pay the fine? I mean if I am wealthy and I can afford to pay the fine as many times as I want then so be it and I will suffer no consequences. Is there a sort of remedial program say after x amounts of citations you have to attend? is your license revoked? ANSWER......don't worry I'll wait.....you guessed it...no negative consequence as long as you keep paying your hefty $100 fine. The only negative consequence is if you DO NOT pay. Dear Madam police chief, you may think we believe your load of crap but I would like to see if there was a suddden increase in your income since....
SSG Marc J. Sierra January 30, 2013 at 05:36 PM
I say a class action law suit should be brought forth against the City of Des Plaines!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something