.

Plumbing Company’s Reputation Questioned by Aldermen; Bid Approved

Bishop Plumbing received eight complaints since 2008, filed with the Consumer Protection Commission.

A bid for a contract worth nearly $200,000 to replace plumbing in city hall was approved by , 5-3, this month despite concerns voiced by aldermen.

Fifth Ward Alderman James Brookman said at the May 7 meeting that he did not support Bishop Plumbing’s bid because the had received several complaints about the company. The commission serves as an alternative dispute resolution, like a mediator, for residents and businesses.

"I can't vote for them to work in city hall," Brookman said.

Brian Wilk, vice president of , said he was aware of four complaints in 2010 and 2011.

“All four complaints have been satisfied with the [Consumer Protection Commission],” Wilk said. “Both parties have been satisfied with the resolution, and I’m not aware of any current complaints or ongoing complaints.”

Earlier:

City attorney David Wiltse said Bishop Plumbing submitted the lowest responsible bid for the project and the complaints received by the commission were for residential work, not commercial work. Bishop's bid of $193,121 was below the city's budget of $200,000.

Tim Ridder, assistant director of public works and engineering, said Bishop Plumbing submitted five references from past, similar jobs with its bid, including the City of Des Plaines because the company has done work for the city in the past.

First Ward Alderman Patricia Haugeberg and Eighth Ward Alderman Michael Charewicz also voted against Bishop Plumbing’s bid.

Haugeberg said she voted against it because she had received complaints from seniors.

“I am going by the complaints that I have received from my residents,” Haugeberg said.

The Better Business Bureau received 42 complaints regarding Bishop Plumbing, according to its website, and provides an explanation of the company’s C- rating.

Consumer Complaints

Through a Freedom of Information request, Patch received copies of eight complaints filed with the Consumer Protection Commission regarding Bishop Plumbing since 2008.

A complaint filed with the commission in October 2009 states Bishop Plumbing sold to and installed for the complainant’s 87-year-old mother a new faucet for $902.45, after a waiver of the $79.95 dispatch fee and a $25 senior discount.

The complaint states that for an hour and 15 minutes of work, and a faucet make and model that normally retails for approximately $137, $400 would have been a fair price.

Another complaint filed with the commission in May 2011, states Bishop Plumbing charged the complainant’s 77-year-old mother $970 to purchase and install a new faucet.

“My mom is a 77-year-old widow,” the complaint states. “I think she was intimidated but also trusted the plumber.”

A complaint filed in September 2008 states Bishop Plumbing charged $613.25 to inspect a flooded basement.

“They did a quick/rushed assessment of issues we have known already and charged an excessive amount of money for nothing done (15 minutes),” the complaint states. “Saw water in basement and left.”

Complainants stated the company refused to show a breakdown of costs on invoices and that additional costs were added after the initial quote.

Kristina Curran, operations manager of Bishop Plumbing, said it is a “flat rate” company. Invoices are not itemized and the rates stay the same no matter how much labor goes into a given project. Curran said prices are decided up-front, contracts are signed before work begins and the inspector does a visual inspection with the customer or the decision-maker of the household.

“Our [pricing] book doesn’t know what color or how old our customers are,” Curran said.

Curran said Bishop Plumbing had received and responded to tens of thousands of calls, and the number of complaints over the course of four years was small.

“These complaints represent a very small percentage of our service calls,” Curran said.

City Hall to Get New Set of Pipes

Ridder said the galvanized steel domestic water pipe in city hall, original to the building, built in 1974, would be replaced with copper pipe. He said sediment build-up over the years was among the reasons for the change, and copper pipe does not have that problem.

Ridder said he hoped the project would begin soon and could be completed in about a month.

Ridder said Bishop Plumbing had completed jobs for the city in the past, and the work at city hall would be overseen by a city employee and checked by a plumbing inspector. In addition, a performance bond is required of the company, so the city is further protected, he said.

“From our viewpoint, these people could have completely legitimate complaints, but how can the city be responsible for verifying every complaint someone turns in about a company, for whatever reason?" Ridder said. "[Should the complaints mean], even though they’re low bid, we shouldn’t use them?"

Brookman said the city should take into account all of a bidder’s work and consider complaints filed with the commission. "Residents complaints should be taken into account. [They are] relevant and significant," he said.

Wilk said Bishop Plumbing had completed projects for the City of Des Plaines for at least the 31 years he had been with the 91-year-old company.

“It’s unfortunate the aldermen are basing their complete opinions on a couple unhappy customers, with all the community service and donations Bishop Plumbing gives to community organizations, such as the food pantry and churches,” Wilk said.

Haugeberg said the current bid qualification process would be worth reviewing.

“Maybe things need to be tightened up,” Haugeberg said.

Find Patch on Facebook; click like.

Stay connected: Receive an email from Des Plaines Patch with headlines in the morning for free.

Judith May 26, 2012 at 08:09 PM
I have dealth with Bishop Plumbing - never again! Their flat rates are totally outrageous. I agree with Alderman Brookman and the others who voted with him.
Josh Adams May 27, 2012 at 04:02 AM
I am glad that Bishop won the Des Plaines bid. I have used them many times, the first time being when I had another local plumber out to rod my sewer. When they couldn't get their rodder through they wanted to dig up my yard. I called Bishop for a second opinion and they rodded the sewer with no problems at all. They even gave me a small break because the plumber felt bad that the previous company had tried to take advantage of me. They are a little bit more expensive but I trust them to know what they're doing so I don't mind paying alittle more for peace of mind.
plumberfullerton June 29, 2012 at 04:18 AM
Great idea..Actually the readers will want to keep an eye on both blogs to catch the responses and new questions – and, since the conversation is being carried out in public, they can comment and share their own perspectives about the questions and answers. http://24hourplumberbrea.com
plumber brea June 29, 2012 at 04:22 AM
The good is about your stuff its a nice topic to us and the believable is about your effort just to post this blog easily..wow thats awesome man thanks for sharing this blog again...keep it up.. http://24hourplumberbrea.com
James Lomonaco October 25, 2012 at 03:25 PM
In Sep I needed to have a kitchen sink drain rodded. I contacted Bishop Plumbing to have the work performed. In two separate phone calls, I tried to get the service rep to give me some idea as to what they charged for that job, but was rebuffed both times, saying that they don’t do quotes over the phone. Two years ago, I had the same exact job done by JespersenPlumbing, who charged $106/hr for 2.5 hrs plus materials for a total of $310.00 When the service man arrived, on 9/21/12, he informed me that they don’t charge by the hour, but by the task, and each task is a separate charge. He said that the charge to rod the drain was $594.00. I thought that this was an incredibly high amount, but as I was leaving on an extended trip shortly, and had to get the drain cleared, I agreed to that fee. The task consists of removing the P Trap, a small U-shaped pipe, rodding the drain pipes, and replacing the P-Trap. The service man broke the P-Trap when he removed it. After he completed the rodding, he informed me that replacing a new P-Trap was a separate task for which the charge is $330.00!!!!!!. At that point, what choice did I have? If I had said NO, he would have left me with an open drain. So again, I agreed. When he was done, I told him I wanted to pay half the $925.00 charge and discuss this whole thing with management. He called and agreed to that. Can you believe they charged me $925.00 to rod a kitchen drain???? I called and complained, nobody listened!! J Lomonaco

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something